Disability Benefits Shake-Up: Lords Urge Action, Starmer Warns of Severe Cuts

by adam
Published On:
Disability Benefits Shake-Up: Lords Urge Action, Starmer Warns of Severe Cuts

Reforming the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) is becoming a central pillar of Labour’s agenda to overhaul the UK’s disability benefits system. With disability claims rising sharply and public finances under strain, pressure is mounting to rethink how the system works—both for claimants and the government.

As debate intensifies, questions arise: Can the system be made fairer? Will changes genuinely support people back into work? And how will disabled individuals be protected in the process?

Why Reform Is on the Table

The UK now spends roughly £65 billion annually on health-related benefits, outpacing even the defence budget, which sits at £54 billion. This surge in spending has drawn the attention of lawmakers and sparked concerns over sustainability.

At the same time, 3.7 million working-age adults now rely on health-related benefits—up 1.2 million since February 2020. Mental health issues and long NHS wait times are major drivers. But policymakers are beginning to question whether simply fixing NHS delays will be enough to reverse the trend.

The Work Capability Assessment: Flawed and Frustrating

Introduced in 2008, the Work Capability Assessment determines whether someone qualifies for Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) or the Limited Capability for Work element of Universal Credit. It evaluates how a person’s health affects their ability to work.

However, the WCA has been plagued by controversy:

  • High rates of incorrect decisions, often overturned on appeal
  • Mistrust among disabled people, who feel the process is biased or overly harsh
  • Delays in assessments, creating uncertainty and financial stress

Labour acknowledges these issues and plans to reform the WCA system. In its manifesto, the party committed to saving £1.3 billion annually through reforms. But exactly how these changes will look remains unclear.

Economic Pressures and Political Push

In a recent report, the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee backed urgent changes to the WCA. Chair Lord Bridges of Headley argued that the current system disincentivizes work and that reforms must strike a balance between support and expectation.

One key recommendation from the committee: returning 400,000 people with long-term health conditions to work could save the government £10 billion.

The government’s long-term goal? An 80% employment rate, driven by local integration of healthcare, employment services, and skills training.

Labour’s Path Forward: What We Know So Far

Labour’s approach involves re-consulting on the WCA after a High Court ruling deemed the Conservative-led review process unlawful. This could lead to a more inclusive and transparent reform process—but critics warn of potential pitfalls.

What’s expected:

  • A Green Paper this spring outlining Labour’s proposed reforms
  • Potential changes to how functional capability is assessed
  • Integration with local support networks, such as job centers and health services
  • A stronger focus on mental health conditions and fluctuating illnesses

Concerns from the Disability Community

While Labour emphasizes fairness and efficiency, disability rights organizations are sounding alarms.

James Taylor, executive director of strategy at Scope, warns that cutting benefits without building better support systems could push disabled individuals deeper into poverty.

He stressed two key issues:

  1. The cost of living is higher for disabled people, and cuts often ignore this reality
  2. The stress of proving eligibility can worsen existing health conditions, making work even harder

There’s a growing consensus among advocacy groups that reforms must not only reduce fraud or inefficiencies—but also remove structural barriers to employment, such as inaccessible workplaces or rigid benefit conditions.

Striking the Right Balance

As Labour moves toward implementing WCA reforms, it faces the delicate task of balancing cost savings with human impact. Pushing more people into work may reduce benefit dependency, but only if the right support is in place to make employment realistic and sustainable.

The upcoming Green Paper will be critical in shaping that path—revealing how Labour intends to adjust assessments, deliver local support, and protect the most vulnerable while restoring trust in a system that many say has long been broken.

FAQs

What is the WCA and why is it controversial?

The Work Capability Assessment determines if someone can receive health-related benefits. It has faced criticism for incorrect decisions and causing stress for claimants.

How much does the UK spend on health-related benefits?

Around £65 billion annually, which is more than what is spent on defence.

What does Labour plan to do differently?

Labour has pledged to reform the WCA, save £1.3 billion annually, and conduct a new public consultation after a court ruled the previous one unlawful.

Will benefits be cut under these reforms?

Labour hasn’t confirmed exact cuts, but some cost-saving measures are likely. Advocacy groups urge investment in support services rather than reductions in aid.

Follow Us On

Also Read

Leave a comment